Friday, March 7, 2008

25 new messages in 7 topics - digest

rec.boats
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats?hl=en

rec.boats@googlegroups.com

Today's topics:

* Well isn't that interesting... - 3 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/browse_thread/thread/7e38af8c68204a20?hl=en
* Ping: Shortwave (and any others interested) - 4 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/browse_thread/thread/6e023df552fe841e?hl=en
* Good to be back;) - 6 messages, 5 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/browse_thread/thread/8b0e88acdd551eec?hl=en
* Another 63,000 Lost Jobs - 2 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/browse_thread/thread/896893768f2633c5?hl=en
* Ethenol - 4 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/browse_thread/thread/b7e577cd16183766?hl=en
* Oy! What a day... - 1 messages, 1 author
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/browse_thread/thread/b52e30893451e410?hl=en
* Judge Yachts Open House - 5 messages, 3 authors
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/browse_thread/thread/5e58fc607a809d22?hl=en

==============================================================================
TOPIC: Well isn't that interesting...
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/browse_thread/thread/7e38af8c68204a20?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 6:14 pm
From: Tim


On Mar 7, 8:13 pm, Short Wave Sportfising <em...@swsportsremove.org>
wrote:
> Enterprise Rent-a-Car was named after the USS Enterprise (WWII).
>
> Apparently the CEO was aboard the Big E at the Battle of Midway.
>
> Didn't know that.

Well, "Popeye" Brand spinach was..

well....

== 2 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 6:28 pm
From: HK


Tim wrote:
> On Mar 7, 8:13 pm, Short Wave Sportfising <em...@swsportsremove.org>
> wrote:
>> Enterprise Rent-a-Car was named after the USS Enterprise (WWII).
>>
>> Apparently the CEO was aboard the Big E at the Battle of Midway.
>>
>> Didn't know that.
>
> Well, "Popeye" Brand spinach was..
>
> well....


I wonder who these were named after:

http://tinyurl.com/2lcmm8

== 3 of 3 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 7:00 pm
From: Tim


On Mar 7, 8:28 pm, HK <payer33...@mypacks.net> wrote:
> Tim wrote:
> > On Mar 7, 8:13 pm, Short Wave Sportfising <em...@swsportsremove.org>
> > wrote:
> >> Enterprise Rent-a-Car was named after the USS Enterprise (WWII).
>
> >> Apparently the CEO was aboard the Big E at the Battle of Midway.
>
> >> Didn't know that.
>
> > Well, "Popeye" Brand spinach was..
>
> > well....
>
> I wonder who these were named after:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/2lcmm8

The boat manufacturer?


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Ping: Shortwave (and any others interested)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/browse_thread/thread/6e023df552fe841e?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 6:15 pm
From: Short Wave Sportfising


On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:13:48 -0800 (PST), Tim <tschnautz@gmail.com>
wrote:

>On Mar 7, 8:12 pm, Short Wave Sportfising <em...@swsportsremove.org>
>wrote:
>> On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:50:06 -0800 (PST), Tim <tschna...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >On Mar 7, 7:21 pm, "Eisboch" <r...@nowhere.com> wrote:
>> >> I don't know how I did this, but I did.
>>
>> >> Here's a section of my youngest son and his wife's wedding video.  It's the
>> >> section where he and his brother (my other son) arrive at the outdoor
>> >> wedding site in a R44.  The wedding took place at one of the houses we had
>> >> in Jupiter, Florida.
>>
>> >> This is the same helicopter and pilot that I was taking a few lessons from.
>>
>> >> Somehow I figured out how to put it on YouTube.  This evening is full of
>> >> surprises.
>>
>> >> Turn the sound up.
>>
>> >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cb5fodUNKI4
>>
>> >huh! somebody's posted already and the typing looks famialiar.
>>
>> Yeah - somebody's finger prints are all over that post.
>>
>> >hmmmmm
>>
>> A Google user - what do you expect.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Yeah,a nd probably on an old windows '98 machine too.!

GOOD LORD!!

Probably a 486 you got out of a dumpster. :>)

== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 6:16 pm
From: Tim


On Mar 7, 8:15 pm, Short Wave Sportfising <em...@swsportsremove.org>
wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:13:48 -0800 (PST), Tim <tschna...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> >On Mar 7, 8:12 pm, Short Wave Sportfising <em...@swsportsremove.org>
> >wrote:
> >> On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 17:50:06 -0800 (PST), Tim <tschna...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> >On Mar 7, 7:21 pm, "Eisboch" <r...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> >> >> I don't know how I did this, but I did.
>
> >> >> Here's a section of my youngest son and his wife's wedding video.  It's the
> >> >> section where he and his brother (my other son) arrive at the outdoor
> >> >> wedding site in a R44.  The wedding took place at one of the houses we had
> >> >> in Jupiter, Florida.
>
> >> >> This is the same helicopter and pilot that I was taking a few lessons from.
>
> >> >> Somehow I figured out how to put it on YouTube.  This evening is full of
> >> >> surprises.
>
> >> >> Turn the sound up.
>
> >> >>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cb5fodUNKI4
>
> >> >huh! somebody's posted already and the typing looks famialiar.
>
> >> Yeah - somebody's finger prints are all over that post.
>
> >> >hmmmmm
>
> >> A Google user - what do you expect.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >Yeah,a nd probably on an old windows '98 machine too.!
>
> GOOD LORD!!
>
> Probably a 486 you got out of a dumpster.  :>)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

No... a yard sale

?;^)

== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 6:26 pm
From: "Eisboch"

"Tim" <tschnautz@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:fbb05465-0642-4e79-a5e1-9b94255c458f@n58g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...

On Mar 7, 7:21 pm, "Eisboch" <r...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> I don't know how I did this, but I did.
>

Just think, richard. You could have had this...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vHjWDCX1Bdw

would have made the neighbors pay attention....

We got plenty of attention. It ended up being a great, but very noisy
post-wedding party. Police showed up twice to warn us to "keep it down".
They were pretty cool, but on the third visit they shut us down. Told me
either I cut the band off or the bride and groom would spend their honeymoon
night in the slammer. I didn't realize it was close to midnight.

Eisboch


== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 6:29 pm
From: "Eisboch"

"Short Wave Sportfising" <email@swsportsremove.org> wrote in message
news:ats3t39vo4af6j1flmubq48h65vtmfh7it@4ax.com...

>
> Is that a commercial program?


http://www.muvee.com/en/

Eisboch



==============================================================================
TOPIC: Good to be back;)
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/browse_thread/thread/8b0e88acdd551eec?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 6:39 pm
From: justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com


Geeze, I needed some info so I went and visited alt.guitars for a few
days.. Holy shit, imagine all of us, having the types of conversations
Harry, Loogie, Jim, and the drunk have, only if we were all 6 years
old and clueless.. Glad to have gotten what I needed, and left them
behind... ;)

I love yous guys.. even you Chuck... ;)

== 2 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 6:43 pm
From: HK


justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com wrote:
> Geeze, I needed some info so I went and visited alt.guitars for a few
> days.. Holy shit, imagine all of us, having the types of conversations
> Harry, Loogie, Jim, and the drunk have, only if we were all 6 years
> old and clueless.. Glad to have gotten what I needed, and left them
> behind... ;)
>
> I love yous guys.. even you Chuck... ;)


Loogie/Bassy is six years old and several steps on the ladder below
clueless.

== 3 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 6:57 pm
From: John H.


On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 18:39:36 -0800 (PST), justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com
wrote:

>Geeze, I needed some info so I went and visited alt.guitars for a few
>days.. Holy shit, imagine all of us, having the types of conversations
>Harry, Loogie, Jim, and the drunk have, only if we were all 6 years
>old and clueless.. Glad to have gotten what I needed, and left them
>behind... ;)
>
>I love yous guys.. even you Chuck... ;)

Welcome back. We really missed your chatter!
--
***** Hope your day is a little better than decent! *****

John H

== 4 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 6:59 pm
From: Tim


On Mar 7, 8:39 pm, justwaitafrekinmin...@gmail.com wrote:
> Geeze, I needed some info so I went and visited alt.guitars for a few
> days.. Holy shit, imagine all of us, having the types of conversations
> Harry, Loogie, Jim, and the drunk have, only if we were all 6 years
> old and clueless.. Glad to have gotten what I needed, and left them
> behind... ;)
>
> I love yous guys.. even you Chuck... ;)

alt.guitar.bass is just as bad.

the alt.guitar.rickenbacker site looked like a a ghost town after the
spammers took over. There were literally weeks before anybody with any
kind of reasoning posted in there.

== 5 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 7:04 pm
From: justwaitafrekinminute@gmail.com


On Mar 7, 9:59 pm, Tim <bschna...@aol.com> wrote:
> On Mar 7, 8:39 pm, justwaitafrekinmin...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Geeze, I needed some info so I went and visited alt.guitars for a few
> > days.. Holy shit, imagine all of us, having the types of conversations
> > Harry, Loogie, Jim, and the drunk have, only if we were all 6 years
> > old and clueless.. Glad to have gotten what I needed, and left them
> > behind... ;)
>
> > I love yous guys.. even you Chuck... ;)
>
> alt.guitar.bass is just as bad.
>
> the alt.guitar.rickenbacker site looked like a a ghost town after the
> spammers took over. There were literally weeks before anybody with any
> kind of reasoning posted in there.

You can tell the biggest trolls, they five star rate their own
posts...;)

== 6 of 6 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 7:13 pm
From: "Eat Me, Trolls"


<<Loogie/Bassy is six years old and several steps on the ladder below
clueless. >>

Thats a no-shitter.


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Another 63,000 Lost Jobs
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/browse_thread/thread/896893768f2633c5?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 6:42 pm
From: HK

Recession fears rise on more job cuts
Fri Mar 7, 2008 7:35pm EST

By Glenn Somerville

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Employers unexpectedly cut jobs in February at
the steepest rate in nearly five years, a second straight month of
employment losses that heightened fears the world's largest economy has
skidded into recession.

"The question appears no longer to be are we going into a recession but
how long and deep it will be," said economist Joel Naroff of Naroff
Economic Advisors Inc in Holland, Pennsylvania.

The Labor Department on Friday said 63,000 non-farm jobs were eliminated
on top of an upwardly revised loss of 22,000 in January, sharply
contrary to Wall Street economists' forecasts that 25,000 positions
would be added in February.

The department also halved the number added in December to 41,000 from
the 82,000 estimated a month ago, in a move that underlined the steady
deterioration in the U.S. labor market.

"The underlying trends are horrible, with worse to come," said economist
Ian Shepherdson of High Frequency Economics in Valhalla, New York. The
Federal Reserve "has to ease (U.S. benchmark interest rates) much more,"
he said.

The U.S. central bank already has cut its federal funds target rate by
2.25 percentage points since September to its current 3 percent level
and is widely expected to slash it again at its next policy-setting
session on March 18.

A Reuters poll on Friday found that most major Wall Street dealers
expect the fed funds rate to be at 2 percent and possibly lower by the
end of April.

STOCK PRICES SUFFER

Stock prices dropped on the unfavorable jobs report, with the Dow Jones
industrial average down 146.70 points at the close to 11,893.69. The
Nasdaq Composite Index was off 8.01 points to end at 2,212.49.

U.S. Treasury debt prices were mixed. The benchmark 10-year note rose
10/32 in price for a yield of 3.56 percent, down from 3.59 percent late
Thursday.

Just before the employment report's release, the Fed said it was
increasing the size of special auctions it conducts twice a month to add
funds, or liquidity, into highly stressed capital markets. That should
make it easier for businesses to borrow money needed to expand and to
boost hiring.

President George W. Bush acknowledged an economic slowdown has begun but
said his administration deserved credit for administering a "booster
shot" in the form of a $152 billion economic stimulus program that
should kick in by summer.

"We believe that the steps we've taken, together with the actions taken
by the Federal Reserve, will have a positive effect on our economy,"
Bush said. Until now, the White House has maintained the economy was not
at risk of recession and still resists questions whether a contraction
is under way.

"Recessions are things that are declared by other people," White House
Economic Adviser Edward Lazear said, though he conceded the Bush
administration has "definitely downgraded" its forecast for
first-quarter economic performance.

The jobs report is one of the first gauges of overall U.S. economic
activity each month, and so the bleak February report sent a shock
through the global financial sector.

WORST SINCE 2003

The back-to-back January and February job losses were the first
consecutive monthly declines since May and June of 2003, shortly after
the start of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.

Labor Department officials said February's job losses were the largest
for any month since March 2003 when 212,000 jobs were cut.

Late on Friday, the Fed issued data showing consumers were still
borrowing heavily to spend in January. Consumer credit outstanding
climbed by $6.9 billion, nearly double December's $3.7 billion gain.

Many economists caution that the next wave of defaults on borrowing is
likely to occur in consumer loans like those taken out to buy cars and
to keep up credit-card payments.

During February, the U.S. unemployment rate eased to 4.8 percent from
4.9 percent in January, but that was because fewer people were in the
labor force. The department said the number of people in the workforce
fell by 450,000 in February, likely a sign that many people have given
up trying to find a job.

Job losses were widespread. Some 52,000 jobs were lost at factories, the
largest decline since July 2003 when 92,000 jobs were cut. Construction
businesses eliminated another 39,000 on top of 25,000 cut in January, a
reflection of the housing industry's deepening woes.

The department said that since the housing boom peaked in September
2006, construction businesses have cut 331,000 jobs.

Retailers also shed jobs last month, dropping 34,000 people off their
payrolls, a possible reflection of concern that hard-pressed consumers
are likely to begin pulling back sharply on spending.

In a statement issued with the data, Bureau of Labor Statistics
Commissioner Keith Hall warned that many of this year's job losses may
take a long time to come back.

(Reporting by Glenn Somerville; Editing by Neil Stempleman)

== 2 of 2 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 6:44 pm
From: HK


HK wrote:
>
> Recession fears rise on more job cuts
> Fri Mar 7, 2008 7:35pm EST
>
> By Glenn Somerville
>
> WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Employers unexpectedly cut jobs in February at
> the steepest rate in nearly five years, a second straight month of
> employment losses that heightened fears the world's largest economy has
> skidded into recession.
>
> "The question appears no longer to be are we going into a recession but
> how long and deep it will be," said economist Joel Naroff of Naroff
> Economic Advisors Inc in Holland, Pennsylvania.
>
> The Labor Department on Friday said 63,000 non-farm jobs were eliminated
> on top of an upwardly revised loss of 22,000 in January, sharply
> contrary to Wall Street economists' forecasts that 25,000 positions
> would be added in February.
>
> The department also halved the number added in December to 41,000 from
> the 82,000 estimated a month ago, in a move that underlined the steady
> deterioration in the U.S. labor market.
>
> "The underlying trends are horrible, with worse to come," said economist
> Ian Shepherdson of High Frequency Economics in Valhalla, New York. The
> Federal Reserve "has to ease (U.S. benchmark interest rates) much more,"
> he said.
>
> The U.S. central bank already has cut its federal funds target rate by
> 2.25 percentage points since September to its current 3 percent level
> and is widely expected to slash it again at its next policy-setting
> session on March 18.
>
> A Reuters poll on Friday found that most major Wall Street dealers
> expect the fed funds rate to be at 2 percent and possibly lower by the
> end of April.
>
> STOCK PRICES SUFFER
>
> Stock prices dropped on the unfavorable jobs report, with the Dow Jones
> industrial average down 146.70 points at the close to 11,893.69. The
> Nasdaq Composite Index was off 8.01 points to end at 2,212.49.
>
> U.S. Treasury debt prices were mixed. The benchmark 10-year note rose
> 10/32 in price for a yield of 3.56 percent, down from 3.59 percent late
> Thursday.
>
> Just before the employment report's release, the Fed said it was
> increasing the size of special auctions it conducts twice a month to add
> funds, or liquidity, into highly stressed capital markets. That should
> make it easier for businesses to borrow money needed to expand and to
> boost hiring.
>
> President George W. Bush acknowledged an economic slowdown has begun but
> said his administration deserved credit for administering a "booster
> shot" in the form of a $152 billion economic stimulus program that
> should kick in by summer.
>
> "We believe that the steps we've taken, together with the actions taken
> by the Federal Reserve, will have a positive effect on our economy,"
> Bush said. Until now, the White House has maintained the economy was not
> at risk of recession and still resists questions whether a contraction
> is under way.
>
> "Recessions are things that are declared by other people," White House
> Economic Adviser Edward Lazear said, though he conceded the Bush
> administration has "definitely downgraded" its forecast for
> first-quarter economic performance.
>
> The jobs report is one of the first gauges of overall U.S. economic
> activity each month, and so the bleak February report sent a shock
> through the global financial sector.
>
> WORST SINCE 2003
>
> The back-to-back January and February job losses were the first
> consecutive monthly declines since May and June of 2003, shortly after
> the start of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq.
>
> Labor Department officials said February's job losses were the largest
> for any month since March 2003 when 212,000 jobs were cut.
>
> Late on Friday, the Fed issued data showing consumers were still
> borrowing heavily to spend in January. Consumer credit outstanding
> climbed by $6.9 billion, nearly double December's $3.7 billion gain.
>
> Many economists caution that the next wave of defaults on borrowing is
> likely to occur in consumer loans like those taken out to buy cars and
> to keep up credit-card payments.
>
> During February, the U.S. unemployment rate eased to 4.8 percent from
> 4.9 percent in January, but that was because fewer people were in the
> labor force. The department said the number of people in the workforce
> fell by 450,000 in February, likely a sign that many people have given
> up trying to find a job.
>
> Job losses were widespread. Some 52,000 jobs were lost at factories, the
> largest decline since July 2003 when 92,000 jobs were cut. Construction
> businesses eliminated another 39,000 on top of 25,000 cut in January, a
> reflection of the housing industry's deepening woes.
>
> The department said that since the housing boom peaked in September
> 2006, construction businesses have cut 331,000 jobs.
>
> Retailers also shed jobs last month, dropping 34,000 people off their
> payrolls, a possible reflection of concern that hard-pressed consumers
> are likely to begin pulling back sharply on spending.
>
> In a statement issued with the data, Bureau of Labor Statistics
> Commissioner Keith Hall warned that many of this year's job losses may
> take a long time to come back.
>
> (Reporting by Glenn Somerville; Editing by Neil Stempleman)


OTTAWA - A whopping 43,000 new jobs were created in February, stunning
economists and creating a widening jobs gap with the United States that
suggests Canada may be able to ride out a mild U.S. recession.

Statistics Canada said Friday the country's unemployment rate remained
unchanged, at a 33-year low of 5.8 per cent, shrugging off the storm clouds
that have swirled for months, including a shrinking trade surplus and gross
domestic product,

In contrast, the United States shed another 63,000 jobs in February.

Finance Minister Jim Flaherty said in London, Ont., that he was
particularly
pleased with the jobs growth in Ontario. Its battered manufacturing sector
lost 20,000 more jobs but the province still added 46,000 jobs, mostly in
construction and public service.

"This is a good development. We have economic growth in all regions of the
country and people are able to adjust to get new jobs," Flaherty said.

Still, the jobs picture shocked most analysts. For the second straight
month,
predictions of a jobs slowdown were dismissed by the real economy.

Like last month, Canada's job report surprised both in the aggregate number
and in the details. The job gains were once again mostly full-time, private-
sector and were concentrated in Ontario, where the slowing U.S. economy is
supposedly being felt the most.

"We are knocked off our feet like everyone else," said Dale Orr of Global
Insight, which Friday downgraded Canada's growth rate this year to 1.6 per
cent, from 1.9 per cent projected last month.

"There is, unfortunately, an ominous side to this," Orr added. "It is
happening in an economy where the pace of output is very weak, meaning
labour
productivity this year is going to be very close to zero."

That suggests that the impressive jobs numbers can't last, said CIBC senior
economist Avery Shenfeld, but it also means that Canada likely won't fall
into recession.

Canada avoided following the U.S. into the 1973-75 oil shock recession and
the 2001 technology slump, and will likely avoid the current U.S. subprime
recession, Shenfeld said, although the manufacturing sector will
continue to
suffer.

"Since Canada never had much of a subprime market, there was nothing to
blow
up (in Canada) in the first place," he pointed out. "The best defence
against
recession in Canada is the consumer sector and with the job growth and some
very nice wage gains to go along with it, there's still a lot of spending
power in the hands of Canadians."

Pay gains also remained strong in February, with the average hourly wage up
4.9 per cent from a year earlier - more than double the rate of inflation.

The employment news initially helped send the Canadian dollar up around
nine-
tenths of a cent. But the currency slipped later in the day and closed down
0.27 cent at 101.05 cents US.

"To say that today's employment numbers were stunning simply doesn't do the
outcome justice," commented TD Bank economist Craig Alexander.

"In fact, we've run out of superlatives to describe the remarkable strength
in the labour market at a time that the other monthly economic reports are
signalling slowing economic growth."

February also saw another record being set with 63.9 per cent of Canadian
adults now holding down a job, as the economy added 361,000 jobs over the
past 12 months.

But the Canadian Labour Congress pointed to "a disconnect between the
slowing
economy we all see and the numbers published by Statistics Canada."

Said CLC president Ken Georgetti: "Can this apparent strength of the job
market continue when there are so many announced or expected layoffs and
plant closures due to the high dollar and rising energy costs?"

Few economists think so, although Orr said he expects the strength in
construction to have legs because Canadians are taking advantage of low
interest rates to buy homes.


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Ethenol
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/browse_thread/thread/b7e577cd16183766?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 6:46 pm
From: John H.


On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:41:36 -0500, HK <payer33859@mypacks.net> wrote:

>John H. wrote:
>> On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:47:01 -0500, HK <payer33859@mypacks.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Don White wrote:
>>>> "John H." <jherringnumericalone@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:0ha3t3t30fgbmkerfnq92ds1npal0sf914@4ax.com...
>>>>> By then we'll be a colony of Mexico with the highest birth rate in the
>>>>> world. If Hillary is going to give all that free stuff away, we'll soon be
>>>>> the most populous also.
>>>>> --
>>>>> John H
>>>>
>>>> My my... you really have a hate on for those little brown guys...eh?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, he does, and he's stated it several times in this newsgroup. I
>>> doubt he learned that in the army, though, since it welcomes people of
>>> color. Maybe that's why he got out...too many of those brown and black
>>> guys, and probably women, too.
>>>
>>> He's a racist pig. He had lovely things to say about the mostly black
>>> kids in the high school where he was a sub teacher.
>>
>> Attack mode, Harry?
>>
>> Where's the new thread?
>> --
>> ***** Hope your day is a little better than decent! *****
>>
>> John H
>
>
>Why would it take a new thread to point out your racism and hatred of
>people of color? This is just a continuation of the thread you tried to
>cancel out with your dot.

Hypocritical

Like Tom, Harry, I've had enough of you.

You're not just a liar, you're a laughably, hypocritical liar.
--
***** Hope your day is a little better than decent! *****

John H

== 2 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 6:45 pm
From: HK


John H. wrote:
> On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:41:36 -0500, HK <payer33859@mypacks.net> wrote:
>
>> John H. wrote:
>>> On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:47:01 -0500, HK <payer33859@mypacks.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Don White wrote:
>>>>> "John H." <jherringnumericalone@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>> news:0ha3t3t30fgbmkerfnq92ds1npal0sf914@4ax.com...
>>>>>> By then we'll be a colony of Mexico with the highest birth rate in the
>>>>>> world. If Hillary is going to give all that free stuff away, we'll soon be
>>>>>> the most populous also.
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> John H
>>>>> My my... you really have a hate on for those little brown guys...eh?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Yeah, he does, and he's stated it several times in this newsgroup. I
>>>> doubt he learned that in the army, though, since it welcomes people of
>>>> color. Maybe that's why he got out...too many of those brown and black
>>>> guys, and probably women, too.
>>>>
>>>> He's a racist pig. He had lovely things to say about the mostly black
>>>> kids in the high school where he was a sub teacher.
>>> Attack mode, Harry?
>>>
>>> Where's the new thread?
>>> --
>>> ***** Hope your day is a little better than decent! *****
>>>
>>> John H
>>
>> Why would it take a new thread to point out your racism and hatred of
>> people of color? This is just a continuation of the thread you tried to
>> cancel out with your dot.
>
> Hypocritical
>
> Like Tom, Harry, I've had enough of you.
>
> You're not just a liar, you're a laughably, hypocritical liar.
> --
> ***** Hope your day is a little better than decent! *****
>
> John H


It's hypocritical to point out your long-held hatred of Latinos and blacks?

== 3 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 7:06 pm
From: "JimH"

"HK" <payer33859@mypacks.net> wrote in message
news:63ecugF27fhi7U4@mid.individual.net...
> John H. wrote:
>> On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:41:36 -0500, HK <payer33859@mypacks.net> wrote:
>>
>>> John H. wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:47:01 -0500, HK <payer33859@mypacks.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Don White wrote:
>>>>>> "John H." <jherringnumericalone@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>> news:0ha3t3t30fgbmkerfnq92ds1npal0sf914@4ax.com...
>>>>>>> By then we'll be a colony of Mexico with the highest birth rate in
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> world. If Hillary is going to give all that free stuff away, we'll
>>>>>>> soon be
>>>>>>> the most populous also.
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> John H
>>>>>> My my... you really have a hate on for those little brown guys...eh?
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yeah, he does, and he's stated it several times in this newsgroup. I
>>>>> doubt he learned that in the army, though, since it welcomes people of
>>>>> color. Maybe that's why he got out...too many of those brown and
>>>>> black guys, and probably women, too.
>>>>>
>>>>> He's a racist pig. He had lovely things to say about the mostly black
>>>>> kids in the high school where he was a sub teacher.
>>>> Attack mode, Harry?
>>>>
>>>> Where's the new thread?
>>>> --
>>>> ***** Hope your day is a little better than decent! *****
>>>>
>>>> John H
>>>
>>> Why would it take a new thread to point out your racism and hatred of
>>> people of color? This is just a continuation of the thread you tried to
>>> cancel out with your dot.
>>
>> Hypocritical
>>
>> Like Tom, Harry, I've had enough of you.

Sorry to post through you Harry but John lives in another world on my
computer.

John Herring.....a man would have said..."Harry, I've had enough of you."

You said........"Like Tom, Harry, I've had enough of you."

No need to bring Tom into this unless you need to hide behind his apron
strings.

Quite telling if I say so.


== 4 of 4 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 7:31 pm
From: HK


JimH wrote:
> "HK" <payer33859@mypacks.net> wrote in message
> news:63ecugF27fhi7U4@mid.individual.net...
>> John H. wrote:
>>> On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:41:36 -0500, HK <payer33859@mypacks.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> John H. wrote:
>>>>> On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:47:01 -0500, HK <payer33859@mypacks.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Don White wrote:
>>>>>>> "John H." <jherringnumericalone@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>>>>>>> news:0ha3t3t30fgbmkerfnq92ds1npal0sf914@4ax.com...
>>>>>>>> By then we'll be a colony of Mexico with the highest birth rate in
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> world. If Hillary is going to give all that free stuff away, we'll
>>>>>>>> soon be
>>>>>>>> the most populous also.
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> John H
>>>>>>> My my... you really have a hate on for those little brown guys...eh?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yeah, he does, and he's stated it several times in this newsgroup. I
>>>>>> doubt he learned that in the army, though, since it welcomes people of
>>>>>> color. Maybe that's why he got out...too many of those brown and
>>>>>> black guys, and probably women, too.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> He's a racist pig. He had lovely things to say about the mostly black
>>>>>> kids in the high school where he was a sub teacher.
>>>>> Attack mode, Harry?
>>>>>
>>>>> Where's the new thread?
>>>>> --
>>>>> ***** Hope your day is a little better than decent! *****
>>>>>
>>>>> John H
>>>> Why would it take a new thread to point out your racism and hatred of
>>>> people of color? This is just a continuation of the thread you tried to
>>>> cancel out with your dot.
>>> Hypocritical
>>>
>>> Like Tom, Harry, I've had enough of you.
>
> Sorry to post through you Harry but John lives in another world on my
> computer.
>
> John Herring.....a man would have said..."Harry, I've had enough of you."
>
> You said........"Like Tom, Harry, I've had enough of you."
>
> No need to bring Tom into this unless you need to hide behind his apron
> strings.
>
> Quite telling if I say so.
>
>


No problem for me. Herring is a dried up old racist f*rt.


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Oy! What a day...
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/browse_thread/thread/b52e30893451e410?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 1 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 6:49 pm
From: John H.


On Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:25:50 GMT, Short Wave Sportfising
<email@swsportsremove.org> wrote:

>On Fri, 07 Mar 2008 18:28:50 -0500, John H.
><jherringnumericalone@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 7 Mar 2008 15:16:52 -0800 (PST), Tim <tschnautz@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>John H. wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >Why do you see helicopters flying with their doors open?
>>>>
>>>> Open? How about 'off'. I don't recall ever seeing the damn doors.
>>>> --
>>>> John H
>>>
>>>They were around, John. (pic of a USN HU-UD1)
>>>
>>>http://www.fas.org/man/dod-101/sys/ac/uh-1-dvic328.jpg
>>>
>>>
>>>You had to remove them if you had a fixed m-134 mini or a stationary
>>>mounted M-2, but they could have been left on., just not closed. Less
>>>weight and less turbulance.
>>>
>>>Most had them taken off, though, unless it was an actual MED-VAC
>>>'copter
>>>
>>>Turbulance? in a ... chopper????
>>
>>Hell, I thought they took them off to make it noisier inside and move
>>streamlined, for those damn vertical descents. Chopper pilots were a crazy
>>bunch. These were our guys in Cu Chi:
>>
>>http://25thaviation.org/id29.htm
>
>Our guys...

Yeah, the Little Bears were the ones that flew us around all the time. They
took me up for morning dawn patrol for six months. They also had a nice
club on Cu Chi to which the Engineers (always in demand) were always
welcome.

I sure don't feel badly calling them 'our guys'.

Something wrong with that, in your humble opinion?
--
***** Hope your day is a little better than decent! *****

John H


==============================================================================
TOPIC: Judge Yachts Open House
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/browse_thread/thread/5e58fc607a809d22?hl=en
==============================================================================

== 1 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 6:49 pm
From: HK

Anyone here going?

http://www.judgeyachts.com/

== 2 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 7:42 pm
From: Tim


On Mar 7, 8:49 pm, HK <payer33...@mypacks.net> wrote:
> Anyone here going?
>
> http://www.judgeyachts.com/

I'd love to if I could. taht boat ont he site looks like a Hatt
design.

Lord! what's with this light green color???

== 3 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 7:47 pm
From: "JimH"

"HK" <payer33859@mypacks.net> wrote in message
news:63ed50F26k8jfU1@mid.individual.net...
>
> Anyone here going?
>
> http://www.judgeyachts.com/
>

Buy me one.


== 4 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 7:48 pm
From: HK


Tim wrote:
> On Mar 7, 8:49 pm, HK <payer33...@mypacks.net> wrote:
>> Anyone here going?
>>
>> http://www.judgeyachts.com/
>
> I'd love to if I could. taht boat ont he site looks like a Hatt
> design.
>
> Lord! what's with this light green color???


I dunno...it's sort of a Palm Beach sickness.

If it isn't pouring, I might head over for a look-see. There's a really
nice Judge at the marina where I usually "launch" Yo Ho, and the brand
has a good rep on the Bay. You never know what you don't go see, as it
were.

== 5 of 5 ==
Date: Fri, Mar 7 2008 7:48 pm
From: HK


JimH wrote:
> "HK" <payer33859@mypacks.net> wrote in message
> news:63ed50F26k8jfU1@mid.individual.net...
>> Anyone here going?
>>
>> http://www.judgeyachts.com/
>>
>
> Buy me one.
>
>


Sure...which one you want?

==============================================================================

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rec.boats"
group.

To post to this group, visit http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats?hl=en

To unsubscribe from this group, send email to rec.boats-unsubscribe@googlegroups.com

To change the way you get mail from this group, visit:
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.boats/subscribe?hl=en

To report abuse, send email explaining the problem to abuse@googlegroups.com

==============================================================================
Google Groups: http://groups.google.com?hl=en

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home